Our Guest Comment today
is by John Pugsley,
Chairman of the
Sovereign
Society, noted author &
founder of The
Bio-Rational Institute.
=======================================================================
COMMENT: The Evolution
of Freedom.
Dear
A-Letter Reader:
John Stuart Mill, the
famous 19th century
philosopher, in his
essay,
'On Liberty', posed
three questions:
* What is the rightful
limit to the sovereignty
of the individual over
himself?
* Where does the
authority of society
begin?
* How much of human life
should be assigned to
individuality, and how
much to society?
I have long puzzled
over the mystery of why
the vast majority of
people,
including those who are
intelligent, educated,
and successful, accept
without question the
idea that 'society',
i.e., government, should
be
assigned authority over
their lives and actions.
This near universal
acceptance of the
authority of the state
is especially baffling
in
light of world history
in which we see that the
State is consistently
the source of human
misery, and government
'solutions' invariably
worsen every problem
that they propose to
solve.
In our quest for
safety and security,
mankind has experimented
with a
wide variety of social
contracts. To date, all
experiments, from
monarchy to democracy,
and from fascism to
communism, grant society
the authority over
individual members.
Since biological
evolution has programmed
each of us to be self-
interested, individuals
entrusted with political
power tend to be
corrupted by that power,
a point famously made by
Lord Acton.
Unfortunately, the
evolution of social
contract technology has
not yet
arrived at a design that
doesn't hand power to
corruptible individuals.
If our species is to
survive, I believe
experimentation will
eventually
lead to the evolution of
a new social system in
which the belief that
society must have
authority over the
individual will change
and a new
status quo will be
created. The majority
will still accept the
customs
and traditions of the
society into which they
are born.
However, those
customs and traditions
will no longer grant
society
arbitrary powers over
individuals. Rather, all
individuals will be
sovereign unto
themselves. Not only is
a world in which
individuals
have sovereignty over
themselves the optimal
social system, it is the
only possible system
that takes into account
the evolutionary nature
of Homo sapiens.
The scientific
evidence is mounting
that the only social
contract that
can insure our species'
survival is one that
leaves each of us
sovereign
over our own lives.
Thomas Paine, whose
remarkable pamphlet
'Common Sense' catalyzed
the
American Revolution,
reminded the colonists
that '...a long habit
of
not thinking a thing
wrong, gives it a
superficial appearance
of being
right, and raises at
first a formidable
outcry in defense of
custom.'
The belief that you
and I and others must be
governed is deeply
imbedded in our beliefs,
our history, our
education and
indoctrination.
Mankind's long habit of
not thinking it wrong
for society to have
authority over the
individual gives the
concept the appearance
of being
right. The near
universal belief that a
society couldn't work if
government isn't in
control is simply wrong.
The answer to Mill's
question has grown out
of the evolution of
mankind.
It is freedom -- a world
in which every
individual is sovereign.
John Pugsley,
Chairman, The Sovereign
Society
San Diego, California
PS: For insights on
the evolutionary roots
of freedom, sign up for
The
Bio-Rational Institute's
FREE weekly e-letter at:
E-mail:
johnpugsley@sbcglobal.net
Web page: LINK:
http://www.biorationalinstitute.com/email.html